Georgia Assessments for the Certification of Educators GACE Practice Test

What type of approach has a company followed if they comply with required anti-pollution legislation but do not go beyond what is legally required?

1. Social Responsibility Approach

2. Social Obligation Approach

3. Social Responsiveness Approach

4. Cost-benefit Approach

The correct answer is: Social Responsibility Approach

The company described in the scenario is following a Social Obligation Approach. This approach signifies a commitment to fulfilling legal requirements regarding environmental regulations without taking additional voluntary steps to exceed those regulations. When a company complies with mandatory anti-pollution legislation, it is essentially acknowledging its responsibility to operate within the legal framework set by the government, which is characteristic of the social obligation mindset. In this context, the focus is on merely meeting the minimum standards imposed by law rather than actively seeking to improve environmental conditions or engage in practices that contribute positively beyond compliance. This indicates a more reactive stance, ensuring that the company is avoiding legal penalties rather than proactively addressing environmental concerns through enhanced measures or initiatives. In contrast, a Social Responsibility Approach implies a broader commitment where organizations actively seek to contribute to societal goals beyond legal compliance. A Social Responsiveness Approach generally involves adapting to stakeholder expectations and being responsive to social issues, possibly implementing changes based on those pressures. The Cost-benefit Approach involves analyzing the financial implications of compliance versus non-compliance, which is not aligned with the basic premise of just adhering to legal requirements.